Re: Swap area: why not more than 128M each?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 13 Mar 1998 18:27:03 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Craig Welch: "Not recognizing all physical memory"
Previous message: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: procfs pre-2.1.90-2 Oops, bug in proc_delete_dentry or proc_delete_inode or something , similar"

> > Not to sound like a dork, but why edo you need a gig of swap? just curious
> > :)
>
> Rule of thumb: swap >= 4 * physical_memory

Not always a good one. Unless you have an extremely good I/O subsystem or
specific high memory use high referential locality tasks its at most 2 or 3
you want.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Craig Welch: "Not recognizing all physical memory"
Previous message: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: procfs pre-2.1.90-2 Oops, bug in proc_delete_dentry or proc_delete_inode or something , similar"