Re: Avoiding SMP

Thomas Molina (tmolina@probe.net)
Sun, 15 Mar 1998 14:35:07 -0600 (CST)

As the originator of this thread, perhaps I should declare the equine
long since expired. However, I must comment by saying that the goal of
a unified kernel is admirable, as long as it doesn't increase the size
of a kernel. Actually, I like the idea of making it a config option the
best.

ObKernelDevelopmentStupidSuggestion: Rewrite the whole shooting match
in C++

On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Dave Cinege wrote:

> Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >
> > > Why is the SMP line uncommented by default anyway? If most
people are
> > > building UP kernels, the default should be UP IMHO.
> > >
> > > Because His Holiness uses SMP?
>
> Further more I think the idea is to wind up with a single SMP capable
kernel
> that works fine on Uni-Proc boxes.
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu