Re: 2.0.34pre4

Benjamin C.R. LaHaise (blah@kvack.org)
Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:46:21 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Myrdraal: "Re: 2.1.91 + netscape 4.04"
Previous message: Jes Degn Soerensen: "Re: GGI Project Unhappy On Linux"
In reply to: Mark Gray: "2.0.33: SB16+VIA-VP2/97+WD1.6Gig + hdparm -u 1 --> disk coruption?"

On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
...
> Related question for the mm guys. In 2.0.x shouldnt the dup_mmap be
> protected by a semaphore ?

Yeap. I noticed the same bug is (was?) in 2.1 recently. Nobody must be
doing lots of simultaneous mmap()ing and fork()ing with clones -- yet. ;-)

-ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Myrdraal: "Re: 2.1.91 + netscape 4.04"
Previous message: Jes Degn Soerensen: "Re: GGI Project Unhappy On Linux"
In reply to: Mark Gray: "2.0.33: SB16+VIA-VP2/97+WD1.6Gig + hdparm -u 1 --> disk coruption?"