Re: Lost keypresses [was Re: GGI and cli/sti in X]

George Bonser (grep@oriole.sbay.org)
Sat, 4 Apr 1998 00:59:07 -0800 (PST)


> > why do you think XFree86 is not `ReallyXFree' (so that you need this `new project')?
>
> Right now XFree is about as 'free' as you can get for everything but the RMS
> definition of free. So long as it doesn't lose the 'freely redistributed
> on commercial CD' stuff, which seems to be the main thing the new license
> threatens we are ok.
>
> > the fact that your wording sounds a bit negative at least to me (might be
> > a result of not being native speaker/listener -- then sorry about that)
>
> No its because I was a bit over the top. I only really see an XReallyFree
> ever needing to exist if XFree itself ends up stuck in some XConsortium member
> problem that requires it opt out.
>
> Alan

My basic gut feeling is that the OpenGroup has done exactly the wrong
thing at exactly the wrong time. At a time when NT is making great inroads
into traditional Unix shops to see someone come along and make at least
some portion of Unix even less accessable and more expensive just seems to
me to be absolutely ignorant unless their plan is to migrate X to a native
NT environment from Unix. Sure, XFree may always be free but as Alan
points out, to what extent will the free X diverge from X? On the other
hand, has the OpenGroup just made X a non-player and pushed even more
players to XFree? At this point X has no choice but go to NT or die as
they have, in my opinion, just committed suicide.

George Bonser
Just be thankful that Microsoft does not manufacture pharmaceuticals.
http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu