Re: 2.1.92, the woes continue

Cyrille Chepelov (chepelov@rip.ens-cachan.fr)
Sat, 4 Apr 1998 16:14:25 +0200 (MET DST)


On Sat, 4 Apr 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

> No need. I can confirm 2.1.89+ and maybe back a couple randomly corrupt
> memory and cause compiles and things to fail very occasionally in my case.
> 2.1.91+ normally crash the machine first however.

On which platform(s) does your confirmation apply ? Could that explain
that gcc (actually, I think it's cpp, cc1 or as, given the usual
error messages) sometimes dies on my Sparc IPX ? (running 2.1.91,
initally bootstrapped with RH4.2).

Thanks in advance.

-- Cyrille

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu