Re: Linux-2.1.92 - Feature Freeze

David Woodhouse (Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk)
Mon, 06 Apr 1998 12:13:45 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jon Tombs: "Re: SUMMARY: GGI/X : the other way??"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: Beta Testers required to test generic i386 graphics framebuffer device"
Maybe in reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Linux-2.1.92 - Feature Freeze"

Philip.Blundell@pobox.com said:
> >That worries me. Linux 2.4 or 3.0 might be done around Jan 2001.
> >Long before then, non-PnP OSs will be in a world of pain.
>
> If the pain is that great then someone will retro-fit PnP into 2.2 once it's
> released.

Isn't that how we f*&%ed up 2.0.3x? Wouldn't it be better to have it done
properly and included from 2.2.0?

---- ---- ----
David Woodhouse, Robinson College, CB3 9AN, England. (+44) 0976 658355
Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk http://www.imladris.demon.co.uk
finger pgp@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk for PGP key.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Jon Tombs: "Re: SUMMARY: GGI/X : the other way??"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: Beta Testers required to test generic i386 graphics framebuffer device"
Maybe in reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Linux-2.1.92 - Feature Freeze"