I spent the day stress testing (at reasonable but high load) 2.1.93.
Performance was quite snappy. The overall feel was that bottlenecks
were sustained io bw limits, and not thrashing as before.
-Mike
after test run #2
Linux 2.1.93 (root@mikeg) (gcc 2.8.1) #18 Tue Apr 7 10:03:03 CEST 1998 [mikeg]
Memory: Total Used Free Shared Buffers Cached
Mem: 77196 55692 21504 9828 24576 11984
Swap: 261496 24004 237492
Bootup: Tue Apr 7 10:09:50 1998 Load average: 5.03 4.88 4.24 2/51 5587
user : 1:22:32.73 29.1% page in : 3100877 disk 1: 419r 0w
nice : 0:00:00.00 0.0% page out: 4523694 disk 2: 171055r 83553w
system: 1:10:26.87 24.9% swap in : 260158 disk 3: 129853r 72209w
idle : 2:10:21.10 46.0% swap out: 225221 disk 4: 314749r 189551w
uptime: 4:43:20.54 context : 4492167
irq 0: 1700070 timer irq 8: 1 rtc
irq 1: 8966 keyboard irq 9: 0
irq 2: 0 cascade [4] irq 10: 1749796 NE2000
irq 3: 0 irq 11: 926962 aic7xxx
irq 4: 0 irq 12: 115729 PS/2 Mouse
irq 5: 0 soundblaster irq 13: 1 fpu
irq 6: 0 irq 14: 0
irq 7: 0 irq 15: 5 HiSax
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu