Re: Choice of "XT PIC" in /proc/interrupts

Geert Uytterhoeven (Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be)
Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:48:30 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Aaron Tiensivu wrote:
> I've kind of wondered this ever since the new format went into the kernel.
> Wouldn't the interrupts above 8 be considered AT interrupts? The 0 thru 8
> were on the XT and then they kludged in another PIC that was cascaded from
> 2 to 9.
>
> Maybe just a simple "Standard PIC" on UP boxes and "APIC" for SMP boxes would
> be appropriate.
>
> Seeing "XT PIC" on makes it sound like my system is ooooooold. :)

I'm happy I have some decent interrupt controller inside (next to two 82c59s
:-(

CPU0
1: 136 82c59 keyboard
2: 0 82c59 cascade
3: 19 82c59 serial
4: 144 82c59 serial
5: 1 82c59 Crystal audio controller
6: 4 82c59 floppy
16: 0 OpenPIC OpenPIC cascade
22: 341691 OpenPIC MESH
26: 0 OpenPIC ADB
29: 2362 OpenPIC DC21041 (eth0)
BAD: 0 spurious or short

Greetings,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven                     Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be
Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP}  http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~geert/
Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu