Re: Possible routing bug [2.1.97]

Roy P. Turner (ecstasy@dopamine.com)
Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:18:11 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Brian Gerst: "Re: Adaptec 1505 SCSI controller"
Previous message: Joey Hess: "empty_dir: bad directory (dir #1177779) - no data block"
Maybe in reply to: Mailing lists account: "Possible routing bug [2.1.97]"

In message <19980424084944.A12116@caffeine.ix.net.nz>, Chris Wedgwood writes:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 03:38:20PM +0200, Mailing lists account wrote:
> > Not sure if this is a kernel bug or a bug in net-tools...
> >
> > [root@k6 /root]# route
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> > 10.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> > 10.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> > 134.130.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 ippp0
> > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> > default max.rz. 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ippp0

Why is the local ethernet route listed twice? I also see this on
my 2.1.97 box.

206.104.221.243 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
206.104.221.242 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
206.104.221.241 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
206.104.221.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
206.104.221.244 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
206.104.221.224 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth0
206.104.221.224 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 206.104.221.225 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

Thanks,
Roy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Brian Gerst: "Re: Adaptec 1505 SCSI controller"
Previous message: Joey Hess: "empty_dir: bad directory (dir #1177779) - no data block"
Maybe in reply to: Mailing lists account: "Possible routing bug [2.1.97]"