It has subtley
> than +/- 200ppm. I think this should be (2 * HZ)ppm. If this is a
> really bad idea please let me know! Can this be added to 2.0.34 (and
> 2.1.x if appropriate)?
It looks right to me
> As an aside can anyone tell me a good reason why ntp_adjtime() and
> ntp_gettime() are not implemented in glibc (2.0.7 and earlier don't
> have them). Not putting them in libc makes xntpd3 have to work much
> harder to use the kernel-pll (xntp3-5.93 won't detect it at all on my
> alphas without much hackery. I can provide trivial wrappers to
> __adjtimex() if anyone wants them. When I reported the problems to the
> xntpd maintainers they suggested I switch to FreeBSD!
Send the diffs to the glibc maintainers. Im sure they'll be happy to add
them
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu