> Second, a bad news that seems everyone has already known: M$ won
> the sue and M$ Windows 98 is to be published on time (the 15th may).
It's not really bad news. Putting out a half-working and
sluggish product just when everyone is looking your way
and all your users are frustrated isn't _that_ good a
move :)
Maybe it's time to start marketing a Linux-2000 as soon
as 2.2 is out...
> It's really a, i.e., imbalance of marketing and has a coeffect
> which ties US government and M$ altogether, that, in the future
> the government would pay even greater effort to catch it and
> dispose. :<
This makes MS look even more like the evil moguls
America had in the start of the century. Having a
bad (ie: even more sluggish and instable) product
shoved down your throat, just when you are fed up
with the non-reliability of '95 is the last thing
consumers want.
'98 might just be the best opportunity other OS
vendors have had for years...
Rik.
+-------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
| Linux: - LinuxHQ MM-patches page | Scouting webmaster |
| - kswapd ask-him & complain-to guy | Vries cubscout leader |
| http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ | <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> |
+-------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu