Re: kernel growth revisited

Andi Kleen (
17 May 1998 04:26:30 +0200

Samuli Kaski <samkaski@cs.Helsinki.FI> writes:

> Just did couple of finds, sorts and cuts. In my specific environment I
> see the most growth has happened in IPv4╣. There were noticable
> deminishment in crucial code parts▓ which should ofcourse be a good
> thing. However here are the code parts that have grown the most│ in my
> particular setup. This however should be taken with a grain of salt
> since there are files in 2.1 that weren't in 2.0 and they haven't been
> included in the comparasion.
> Comments?

If you want a bit more accurate comparison check out


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to