Re: 2.1.103 cache size still too big

Edgar Toernig (froese@gmx.de)
Fri, 05 Jun 1998 02:08:30 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hubert Tonneau: "Re: RFS?"
Previous message: Riley Williams: "Re: Multiple swap partition uglies (fwd)"

Rik van Riel wrote:
> We should have a maximum percentage of memory that can be
> used for the caching of _one_ file, possibly tunable by
> counting the number of pagefaults for this file vs. the
> total number of pagefaults in the system.

One day you'll have so much *tunables* that you have to
swap /proc/sys :-(

IMO, memory managment is going the wrong way...

Ciao, ET.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Hubert Tonneau: "Re: RFS?"
Previous message: Riley Williams: "Re: Multiple swap partition uglies (fwd)"