Re: [2.1.105] Cyrix 6x86 reduced to 486

Phil's Kernel Account (kernel@eiterra.nls.net)
Tue, 9 Jun 1998 23:10:56 -0400 (EDT)


On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Adam Sulmicki wrote:

#AFAIK, it is b/c cyrix probing and Intel's BX chipsets did not like
#each other.

No. Intel designed BX so that probing for their competitors would break
the OS.

#Intel got right of way, and Cryix detection got disabled for now.

Why? Intel's the ones getting sued by the FTC for anti-trust along with
Microsoft. You going to give Microsoft right of way? Yeah, two totally
different fields, but what gives Intel the right, hmm?

#I think it is going to come back with TSC path or something like that.

it's going to come back as soon as I can find enough time between dealing
with contract jobs, email, and the phone, to do some SERIOUS CPU detection
work. Fun, yeah. }:P

-Phil R. Jaenke (kernel@nls.net / prj@nls.net)
TheGuyInCharge(tm), Ketyra Designs - We get paid to break stuff :)
Linux pkrea.ketyra.INT 2.0.33 #15 Sat Apr 18 00:40:21 EDT 1998 i586
Linux eiterra.nls.net 2.1.98 #15 Fri May 1 18:21:00 EDT 1998 i586
- Linus says for 'brave people only.' I say 'keep a backup.' - :)
! I reserve the right to bill spammers for my time and disk space !

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu