Wow. You can threaten people with lawyers. What you cannot apparently do
is tell people precisely what Alan is lying about:
a) That KDE has never had a formal (or even informal) security audit, and
recent BUGTRAQ traffic lends itself well to the need for such a
thing...
-or-
b) That KDE, due to licensing issues, could make life hard on those
building a distribution around it...
>From where I sit (and frankly, I have no political or financial bias in
-any- direction), I think they're both very valid points. Care to address
them instead of providing thinly veiled threats of legal action?
And how the devil did this -ever- come up on linux-kernel anyway?
-- -------------------. emarshal at logic.net .--------------------------------- Edward S. Marshall `-----------------------' http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/Linux labyrinth 2.1.105 #6 SMP Mon Jun 8 22:20:16 CDT 1998 i586 unknown 11:00pm up 8:06, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu