Re: 2.1.x kernel and nfs

Matthew G. Marsh (mgm@paktronix.com)
Fri, 12 Jun 1998 06:18:00 -0500 (CDT)


On 12 Jun 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:

> In article <35808576.D9ED594B@transmeta.com>,
> Bill Hawes <whawes@transmeta.com> wrote:
> >Kumsup Lee wrote:
> >> Yes, it is. By the way I am using Debian-1.3.
> >I'm not sure of the exact reason, but perhaps portmap starts more sloly
> > under 2.1.xx, or nfs starts more quickly. But a number of people have
> > reported this problem, and the solution has
> > generally been to start portmap first.
> >
> > Hopefully the distributions will correct their startup scripts before 2.2 ...
>
> In Debian-2.0, this is corrected by starting the portmapper before any NFS
> mounts (but only if needed). Is it true that between starting the
> portmapper and doing the NFS mount one needs an _extra_ sleep of 1 or 2
> seconds (or more)? Can someone confirm this?

Yes. That was what I finally ended up putting in my network file. Started
Portmap then "slept" for 5 seconds (could probably work < 5). I have not
tried starting NFS mount later in a different init.d script... that may
work as well.

System: 2.1.105 / SMP 2xPII 333 / 100BT / TokenRing

mgm

>
> Mike.
> --
> Miquel van Smoorenburg | Our vision is to speed up time,
> miquels@cistron.nl | eventually eliminating it.

--------------------------------------------------
Matthew G. Marsh, President
Paktronix Systems, LLC
1506 North 59th Street
Omaha NE 68104
Phone: (402) 553-2288
Email: mgm@paktronix.com
WWW: http://www.paktronix.com
--------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu