Re: Y2K

Peter K (pko@paradigm-sa.com)
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 15:54:57 +0200 (GMT+0200)


On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Jon Lewis wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > Problems will occur at (I think I remember) the year 2054 because
> > the time_t integer is not large enough. By that time, we should all have
> > 256-bit machines so the problem should go away.
>
> It's 2038 for 32-bit systems. Even with 64-bit systems, time_t wrap isn't
> an issue...unless you expect to be around in about 292471208649 years.

Hmmm. You should use 365.25, which would make it 292271023045, not
considering an annual slow-down of approx .02 secs, which would bring it
to about 292271022663, given that the decay is linear ...

<shrug> by which time the sun has long ceased anyway.

I feel so *mortal* when viewing these numbers.

Peter Kooiman | Voice : +27-12-672-5700/10
Paradigm Systems Technology | Fax : +27-12-663-4191/2
Pretoria, South Africa | Cell : +27-82-651-4985
Box 9984, HENNOPSMEER, 0046, RSA | e-mail : pko@paradigm-sa.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu