Re: Security Audit
Nathan Clemons (linux@ici.net)
Mon, 22 Jun 1998 15:42:24 -0400
At 03:15 PM 6/22/98 -0400, Nathan Clemons wrote:
>At 02:49 PM 6/22/98 -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe the Debian policy is identical on this issue
>>
>>It is. We always try to pass fixes upstream.
>>
>>I still agree with Leonard that it would be nice if there was some sort of
>>distribution-neutral patch repository, where people could put things so
>>others might use them without having to grovel through RedHat's SRPMS or
>>Debian's .diff.gz files. It might also facilitate cross-pollenation between
>>RedHat and Debian as well.
>>
>>Perhaps this is something that freshmeat could be enhanced to handle...
>>
>>Mike.
>>
>
>What kind of space are we talking about? I could possibly find the space
>on my domain for an amount of time before I end up getting a colocated
>server. And let's face it, _everyone_ benefits from a centralized source of
>security fixes.
>
>Even crackers benefit... it makes them actually have to work =)
>
>
>StormeRider --- http://www.windsofstorm.net/wos
>silk@ici.net --- #telnet://winds.windsofstorm.net:4004
>linux@ici.net --- Slackware 2.0.30
Hmm, guess I should have updated the sig file before posting. Thanks to
this list and #linux and #unixhelp on Effnet I was able to upgrade the kernel
from .30 to .33 and then up to .34. There's a lot I still need to understand
in the configuration stages of making a new kernel (ie, I still have problems
with any version of the sound module I compile myself), but... it works. =)
StormeRider --- http://www.windsofstorm.net/wos
silk@ici.net --- #telnet://winds.windsofstorm.net:4004
linux@ici.net --- Slackware 2.0.34
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu