> Yes, but that's OK, because the 2000 *is* a leap year. (It's divisible
> by 100, but years which are divisible by 400 are an exception to the
> divisible by 100 rule, so while 1800 and 1900 were not leap years, 2000
> is a leap year).
>
Please don't tell this to your local astronomer! They'll tell you a leap
year is divisble by 4 not 100 and a leap century is divisble by 400.
Seth
There is no Emotion, There is Peace
There is no Ignorance, There is Knowledge
There is no Passion, There is Serenity
There is no Death, There is the *****
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu