2.1.107 spelling bug introducion

Pavel Machek (pavel@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz)
Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:58:07 +0200


Hi!

Someone put lots of spelling fixes into 2.1.107. I do not like them,
but ok.

But this is much too much: We need _fixed_ interface to user
programs. We should not not absolutely not change it just because
someone decides that fpu exception should be in big letters!

Please reverse that change.

Pavel

@@ -457,7 +466,7 @@
continue;
#endif
p += sprintf(p, "processor\t: %d\n"
- "cpu family\t: %c\n"
+ "CPU family\t: %c\n"
"model\t\t: %s\n"
"vendor_id\t: %s\n",
n,
@@ -503,9 +512,9 @@
"hlt_bug\t\t: %s\n"
"sep_bug\t\t: %s\n"
"f00f_bug\t: %s\n"
- "fpu\t\t: %s\n"
- "fpu_exception\t: %s\n"
- "cpuid level\t: %d\n"
+ "FPU\t\t: %s\n"
+ "FPU_exception\t: %s\n"
+ "CPUID level\t: %d\n"
"wp\t\t: %s\n"
"flags\t\t:",
c->fdiv_bug ? "yes" : "no",

-- 
The best software in life is free (not shareware)!		Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu