> Anyway, looking at the table it is fairly obvious why machines with much
> memory don't tend to have problems..
Yes, precisely. From your figures, 64MB machines are just right for 2.1.x
kernels at the moment which is quite reasonable, but if we could get this
fixed for 8MB boxes - 46% attrition rate isn't good - [which most 386s
usually have], then I think everyone would be a lot happier with that.
I don't know if there are anyone still using 4MB boxes with 2.1.x kernels
- anyone else care to speak up?
Cheers,
Alex.
--- /\_/\ Legalise cannabis now! ( o.o ) Smoke some cannabis today! > ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.Check out http://www.tahallah.demon.co.ukA
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html