Uneducated guess, but I think this will produce the desired effect, wont
it?
-Shawn
<=========== America Held Hostage ===========>
Day 2001 for the poor and the middle class.
Day 2020 for the rich and the dead.
921 days remaining in the Raw Deal.
<============================================>
On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:18:52 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >> > > The 2.0.35 release notes let me do a slightly unscheduled stress test
> >> > > on the 2.1.108 code.
> >> > >
> >> > Maybe it's interesting for some people to post more details
> >> > of your stress tests, so people can do some tests on their hardware.
> >>
> >> Note the "slightly unscheduled". The 2 pages a second are the 2.0.35 release
> >> notes at http://roadrunner.swansea.linux.org.uk. It wasnt planned stress testing
> >
> >Ah, thanks for your quick reply.
> >
> >I thought you eventually had some ideas for a planned stress testing.
> >It's sometimes very difficult to test a new kernel on "low loaden
> >workstations".
> >The best test would be to put it on a production machine, but who knows what
> >happens. ;)
>
> The one thing that is hard to do with development kernels is
> testing the effect of long uptimes. Is there any way to
> simulate this, perhaps by putting a machine under heavy load
> in some way?
>
> Ganesh
> --
> ganesh.sittampalam@magd.ox.ac.uk
> http://users.ox.ac.uk/~magd0688
> Life is a terminal illness
> PGP Key 0xFDE02725 Fingerprint 4CD6 D38E 0CB3 A9F8 2308 7637 7A3C 0565
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html