> >BTW, not one fork failure despite 2 concurrent make -j bzImage. With
> >earlier kernels this always eventually led to fork failures. (K=109)
>
> Nice! BTW I don' t think that a make -j is the best thing to use to
> stress the stack...
Do you think something like glimpse indexing a small (3.6g) array would
be better? One BIG process doing massive fs job.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html