..
> And I just heard that this whole fragmentation problem is the result of
> having a dcache, which is why 2.1 NEEDS to worry about fragmentation but
> 2.0 didn't. But I don't really know what I'm talking about, just overhear
Uhumm and I thought the exact opposite was true. At least I originally
moved away from 2.0.32 because the box became absolutely unusable after
5 or so days. I have been running 2.1.[96-105] for upto 30 days and I
don't see any problems. (sound works, X doesn't get jerky and so on)
As I see it the 2.1 fragmentation issues have seen the daylight in the
past 2 months or so, can't say exactly when.
-- Samuli Kaski, samkaski@cs.helsinki.fi Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html