Re: patch-ikd+profile+stack-meter against 109

Andrea Arcangeli (arcangeli@mbox.queen.it)
Sat, 18 Jul 1998 19:27:09 +0200 (CEST)


On Sat, 18 Jul 1998, Michael L. Galbraith wrote:

>Do you think something like glimpse indexing a small (3.6g) array would
>be better? One BIG process doing massive fs job.

I think yes. Please also upgrade to my latest idk patch (-3) since I was
accounting the stack only for process with pid != 0 but I can' t see any
good reason to not account also the stack for the pid 0 (an so for the
interrupts that happens while idle was running). The same should be true
for KSTACK_MAGIC.

Andrea[s] Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html