2.0.34 vs 2.1.109 on lowend.
Peter Enderborg (pme@ufh.se)
Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:20:17 +0200
A small test off the kernels on my old 486 with 8Mbyte..
I have tested to compile the 2.1.109 kernel with the 2.1.109 and with
2.0.34.
The system is unpatched rh5.1, everything is on the local disk expect
for the source
tree. Witch is on a RH5.1 NFS server.
Results:
Linux dural 2.1.109 #7 SMP Sun Jul 19 10:58:01 MEST 1998 i486 unknown
real 14516.13
user 6134.95
sys 1099.97
pme@dural$
Linux dural.ampr.org 2.0.34 #1 Fri May 8 16:05:57 EDT 1998 i486 unknown
real 11507.25
user 5807.26
sys 1107.00
pme@dural$
14516/11507=1.2614930042
26% longer time on the new kernel.
Is that good or bad ?!
--
foo!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html