Performance of 2.1.110 compared to 2.1.108

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Myrdraal: "Soundcore never unloads."
• Previous message: Jeremy Domingue: "Rule of thumb for /proc/sys/kernel/inode(&file)-max"

System is a dual P200-MMX, 128 MB RAM, 64 MB swap. I timed a complete
build of a 2.1.110 kernel tree (from make dep to make modules).
During the compile X11, Mosaic, and two CPU intensive background jobs
were running.

2.1.110:
real 16m20.868s
user 19m22.290s
sys 3m13.730s

2.1.108:
real 21m7.339s
user 14m57.850s
sys 2m0.500s

So 2.1.110 was much faster in real time, but I don't know how to
interpret the other numbers...

hjb

-- 
"Every use of Linux is a proper use of Linux."
				-- John "Maddog" Hall, Keynote at the Linux
				   Kongress in Cologne

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

• Next message: Myrdraal: "Soundcore never unloads."
• Previous message: Jeremy Domingue: "Rule of thumb for /proc/sys/kernel/inode(&file)-max"