Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Any chance that SMP as a real config option will make it into 2.2?
>
> I know it touches quite a few Makefiles and headers, but I have only
> heard (and seen) good things about it. Last I heard the only thing
> holding it back was some testing on s/linux.
>
> It would be nice not to have all the 'how do I enable SMP' questions,
> and would also indicate that the SMP support is 2.2 is 'real' and
> 'supported' instead of an add on. ;)
>
> What do you think linus?
>
> kevin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
>
That would be nice. And if you configure SMP, it should do a parallell make.
$MAKE=make -j2
Or maybe we could have a variable SMP that is the numbers of CPUs it should
optimize for ?!
--------------859A7D098CA55693302EED49
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="pme.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Peter Enderborg
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="pme.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Enderborg;Peter
tel;work:+46 8 5883 6226
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:ABNAMRO Software AB;Stockholm
adr:;;Norrmalmstorg 14;Stockholm;;10726;Sweden
version:2.1
email;internet:pme@abnamro-software.com
title:Programmer
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Peter Enderborg
end:vcard
--------------859A7D098CA55693302EED49--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html