[snipped, for my sanity (and yours, too)]
>
> I certainly would, but then the CPU is not detected as Cyrix. Thus my message.
Subject says it all. No detection problems with kernel 2.0.35, Cyrix 6x86
P166 processor (except it could be faster :)..).
[rest o' message]
> ADB> All the above remarks apply to 2.0.x kernels. I am not current on 2.1.x
> ADB> kernel code. Please correct if I am missing something.
>
> I've found this problem with the later 2.0.35 and 2.1.x kernels, both
> advertising Cyrix detection.
>
> --
> 00000000: 4e69 636f 6c61 6920 5020 4775 6261 2c20 Nicolai P Guba,
> 00000010: 4253 4328 486f 6e73 292c 2041 5254 2c20 BSC(Hons), ART,
> 00000020: 4272 6974 6973 6820 5465 6c65 636f 6d20 British Telecom
> 00000030: 4c61 6273 2c20 554b Labs, UK
>
/*
Paul Duncan p_duncan@efn.org Indifference will be the downfall
http://www.efn.org/~p_duncan of humanity, but who cares? - fortune
"in short, all known bugs should be "I'm to blame; I wonder just who
fixed, but hey, what else is new?" made the rules up for this game."
- Linus Torvalds - nine inch nails
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html