Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds

Alan Cox (linker@z.ml.org)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:50:28 -0400 (EDT)

Whats next? Is he going to tell us they break signals?!?
If they really broke all those things, how would people be running the
patch?

On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

> > I saw some other funny effects later and backed them out.
> >
> > They also break the trampolines emmited naturally by gcc.
>
> They dont
>
> > Alan, this and for other reasons are why I think they should be
> > seperate patch sets, never in the mainline.
>
> If the statement was remotely true it might be valid. They however dont
> break selectors and dont break trampolines.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html