Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
• Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
• Maybe in reply to: Zachary Amsden: "[PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
• Next in thread: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"

Adolfus Penguin

Speaking of nazi rules...

http://linux.mit.edu/~ndf/gates.jpg

:-)

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

• Next message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
• Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
• Maybe in reply to: Zachary Amsden: "[PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
• Next in thread: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"