Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 10 Aug 1998 01:27:26 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Terry L Ridder: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: devfs: The conclusion."
In reply to: Meino Christian Cramer: "RE: PPP --- TCP bad checksums"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: PPP --- TCP bad checksums"

> Yes, but you must admit it might have sounded like you were claiming
> that a fully populated SCSI /dev along with every conceivable psuedodevice
> is peanuts, and noone cares.
>
> I kind of like having to search through ONLY the device nodes I have.

Which are all you need to have in /dev. Can you try using facts in your
reasoning. It makes it easier to find a logical conclusion

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Terry L Ridder: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: devfs: The conclusion."
In reply to: Meino Christian Cramer: "RE: PPP --- TCP bad checksums"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: PPP --- TCP bad checksums"