Re: is this fs corruption?

Andrea Arcangeli (arcangeli@mbox.queen.it)
Tue, 11 Aug 1998 20:23:33 +0200 (CEST)


On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>care of every possible upgrade. The next week I' ll try a fsck -f. If

root@dragon:~# fsck -f /dev/hda1
Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98)
e2fsck 1.12, 9-Jul-98 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/hda1: 84098/462848 files (7.8% non-contiguous), 1526050/1846624
blocks
root@dragon:~# fsck -f /dev/hda3
Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98)
e2fsck 1.12, 9-Jul-98 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/hda3: 1463/206040 files (27.8% non-contiguous), 577601/822528 blocks

Everything is fine after some days of _heavy_ use. So I dubit on a problem
of the fs subsystem not IDE related. gcc is 2.8.1.

>everything will be OK I' ll return to enable DMA to try to reproduce. I

Now I am running again with UDMA and I' ll return to run a fsck by hand
the next week, to see if there will be again sign of fs corruption.

Andrea[s] Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html