Re: Patches vs complete tarballs....

ketil@ii.uib.no
14 Aug 1998 12:21:10 +0200


ketil@ii.uib.no writes:

> I haven't heard anybody else complain about this, but I managed to mess
> up patching, and downloaded 2.1.115.tar.gz from ftp.funet.fi. I had to
> manually make the two "modules" directories, as well as copy in
> "autoconf.h" from a previous build (kernel patched up to 2.1.107, I
> think) After that, building worked perfectly, and I'm using the kernel
> as we type.

I guess this is a bit unclear. Patching the kernel wasn't the problem.
Building a pristine unpacked linux-2.1.115.tar.gz was, after unpacking I
needed to mkdir two modules directories, as well as copy autoconf.h into
the include directory.

It's working perfectly (AFAICS) now.

But either the linux-2.1.115.tar.gz at ftp.funet.fi is slightly broken,
or I somehow managed to screw up a simple tar command (or the subsequent
steps - copying in the old .config, and make dep clean zlilo modules\
modules_install, after cleansing the makefile of SMP and /boot stuff.)

So, as I said, it's not a problem for me, I'm just a bit puzzled that it
happened.

~kzm

-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html