I disagree, If we stop calling them "unstable" then people will start to
depend on them and if we have a buggy version it will cause more problems.
Yes some of them are more stable (we are after all getting ready to roll
over to 2.2) but the fact remains they are development version, things are
new, untested and (probably) will break at least on some systems.
David Lang
On Fri, 14 Aug 1998, Nomad the Wanderer wrote:
> We really gotta stop calling them "unstable" as they're not. They're
> developemental. Miy firewall's running 2.1.10X and it's been up amost
> 2 months I think. My desktop is 2.1.115 and the only reason I rebootyed
> it was to install that instead of 2.1.110...
>
> Robert
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNdR/nj7msCGEppcbAQFzowgApAbPwiA2/ln6BXB0pm428XraTawFXUUu
snN4smcfM8OWdGVe9p3AX7Ud8sn5UOitQcVclXAQYmRn4Z09t6CqkgK5hIvvR598
GmAzIvosrHzBny+qxf2xsW8663y+eOWKTmlx+lR/BJNQQ8UX/OtLlWwNPMgZ8f5i
XnopJFI6rVFGGX7TvJbdvvH0utJ8jLbWSuyjpaOrUx5MBE/Nz6Xz5uy0AjWKRr6Q
mTe0G879amL7lfTZY7dqiQNsxORWG5JrdnYSzexn9o3HhQUc8dDqs08Q8QsXOEnx
UUR3EgTvQUydMC1zkQvOlW7rdxJhdyR8CBHv68G2/P2JcWf/fM9+6g==
=jCr8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html