Re: Linux 2.1.116
Myrdraal (myrdraal@jackalz.dyn.ml.org)
Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:18:21 -0400
On Wed, Aug 19, 1998 at 10:27:24AM -0400, bytor@bitchx.com wrote:
Hi,
> Compiling kernels 2.1.116 and 2.1.115 I get a sig 11 from gcc while
> compiling vt.c... Of course it doesnt happen when you remove the
> optimizations. Compiler is (don't say it!) egcs compiled from the egcs
> mainline CVS source tree (recompiled once/day). Has anyone who tracks the
> egcs source tree seen a similar problem lately?
2.1.116 compiled with the latest snapshot, 2.1.115 compiled with the previous
snapshot. -O99 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math. No problems at all. It's
not the CVS version, though, and the snapshots are based on the release
tree now.
-Myrdraal
--
Linux jackalz 2.1.116 #120 Tue Aug 18 23:16:43 EDT 1998 i486
12:17pm up 12:24, 20 users, load average: 0.10, 0.04, 0.06
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html