Re: NAT 4 Linux (project)

Michael Hasenstein (m.hasenstein@rocketmail.com)
Fri, 21 Aug 1998 14:44:49 -0700 (PDT)


(rewrite response for the list, didn't see the authors Cc: to the list
so only responded to him)

Paul Wouters <paul@xtdnet.nl> wrote:

> I am probably missing something here. Why would you built something to
> split up requests like this when it's a thousandfold easier to just do
> some round robin DNS to divide the load? If NFS mounted disks on the
> servers is too slow, i am sure some smart mirroring ultrawide scsi
> with a fast network setup could fix that too.

so far: every webserver needs to have access to all files. if it's
split, a server only needs access to some files. files are on file
servers. so far: every webserver connected to every fileserver. after
split: less 'competition' per wire.

They didn't say they wanted to do it like this 100% and over, it was
an IDEA that they would have liked to test.

--
Michael Hasenstein; Siemens Nixdorf (Consultant)
currently @Oracle, California (09/07/1997 - 06/12/1998)
          @PeopleSoft, California (June 98 - ???)
http://www.csn.tu-chemnitz.de/~mha/
Private Pilot (ASEL) since 1998

_________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html