Re: Useless smbfs !

Bill Hawes (whawes@transmeta.com)
Tue, 25 Aug 1998 18:46:26 -0700


Hakan.Lennestal@cdt.luth.se wrote:

> I've been trying to get smbfs to work in various 2.1.11* version without
> any positive results. Currently I'm banging my head against 2.1.117.
> I'm running a UP system that is mainly RH 5.1 based.
> I'm using smbmnt and smbmount from samba-1.9.18p8, compiled with hints
> from Peter Waltenberg (among others) on this list.
> The shares I'm mounting is from a local Win95 machine.
>
> Anyway, my futile efforts always ends in:
>
> [root@tuttifrutti src]# smbmount \\\\loo\\c passwd -c "mount /loo/c"
> Added interface ip=130.240.142.33 bcast=130.240.142.39 nmask=255.255.255.248
> Server time is Tue Aug 25 23:02:28 1998
> Timezone is UTC+2.0
> security=share
> [root@tuttifrutti hakan]# ls -l /loo/c
> ls: /loo/c/COMMAND.COM: Too many open files in system
> ls: /loo/c/SETUPLOG.TXT: Too many open files in system
> ls: /loo/c/CONFIG.SYS: Too many open files in system
> ls: /loo/c/306NTWN: Too many open files in system
> ls: /loo/c/pspbrwse.jbf: Too many open files in system

Have you enabled the w95 bug workarounds, either as a kernel option or by using
the mount time flags? If so, you should get a message like this in your syslog:

SMBFS: Win 95 bug fixes enabled

The "too many open files" is probably the result of a bogus error return for one
of the smb messages. Smbfs has lots of workarounds for these, but it needs to
know what kind of server you're using.

Regards,
Bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html