Re: F00F...

Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au)
Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:33:40 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Legal Issues with UDI ( was Re: [Fwd: Uniform Driver Interface (UDI)] )"
Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: Implementing Meta File information in Linux"
Next in thread: Thomas Wouters: "Re: F00F..."
Reply: Thomas Wouters: "Re: F00F..."
Reply: Thomas Bogendoerfer: "Re: F00F..."

Petr Vandrovec Ing. VTEI writes:
> Hello,
> I think that followig patch can help those who have SMP kernel
> and F00F Pentium and new kernels does not show it in cpuinfo.
> Problem is that check_bugs is called after processors are started
> and it is not good idea. I've tested in only on UNI motherboard,
> but I think that this must work. Patch is against 2.1.120pre3.

IIRC, check_bugs() was moved to after smp_begin() for some reason. So
your patch may break something again.

Regards,

Richard....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Legal Issues with UDI ( was Re: [Fwd: Uniform Driver Interface (UDI)] )"
Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: Implementing Meta File information in Linux"
Next in thread: Thomas Wouters: "Re: F00F..."
Reply: Thomas Wouters: "Re: F00F..."
Reply: Thomas Bogendoerfer: "Re: F00F..."