Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower

yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu
Fri, 4 Sep 1998 06:06:50 -0600

On Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 04:24:53AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> 1) If it has balancing overhead like AVL it is not going in, this
> is why Linus and I removed AVL in the first place. Lower latency
> than AVL in the common case is a must.

Bruno's numbers show little cost for AVL - the common case for AVL should
have no rebalancing right? Do you have different numbers?

---------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Department of Computer Science
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Socorro NM 87801
Homepage http://www.cs.nmt.edu/~yodaiken
PowerPC Linux page http://linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu
Real-Time Page http://rtlinux.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html