Re: ipfwadm problems with 2.1.120

David Meyer (paradox@paradoxisp.net)
Sun, 06 Sep 1998 21:26:25 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: ipfwadm problems with 2.1.120"
Previous message: Tim Smith: "Re: [NOT OFFTOPIC] Re: groups"
Maybe in reply to: Matthew J. Probst : "ipfwadm problems with 2.1.120"
Next in thread: Bruno Haible: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"
Reply: Bruno Haible: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"

> Sorry if this has already been clarified, but I cant seem to get ipfwadm
> to work with 2.1.120:
>

Of course not!! Read Changes. ipfwadm is no longer in use in the 2.1.x series,
use ipchains!!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: ipfwadm problems with 2.1.120"
Previous message: Tim Smith: "Re: [NOT OFFTOPIC] Re: groups"
Maybe in reply to: Matthew J. Probst : "ipfwadm problems with 2.1.120"
Next in thread: Bruno Haible: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"
Reply: Bruno Haible: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"