Re: [PATCH] APM 2.0.35 and 2.1.120 (was: Fix for oops at system halt)

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 8 Sep 1998 18:25:10 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Aaron Tiensivu: "Re: Are we *really* in a feature freeze?"
Previous message: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: [offtopic] Re: I2c was: Cobalt Micro (was Re: Build your own"
In reply to: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: [offtopic] Re: I2c was: Cobalt Micro (was Re: Build your own"

> Alan, can this go into 2.0.36?
>
> This is available also at http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
> as is the equivalent patch for 2.1.120 (which includes other fixes
> as well).

Ive dropped this into 2.0.36 for pre9. The only difference is I
put the apm_enabled check into apm_set_power_state

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

Next message: Aaron Tiensivu: "Re: Are we *really* in a feature freeze?"
Previous message: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: [offtopic] Re: I2c was: Cobalt Micro (was Re: Build your own"
In reply to: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: [offtopic] Re: I2c was: Cobalt Micro (was Re: Build your own"