Re: [offtopic] Re: I2c was: Cobalt Micro (was Re: Build your own Mo therboards)

Richard B. Johnson (root@chaos.analogic.com)
Wed, 9 Sep 1998 16:41:39 -0400 (EDT)


On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Erik Corry wrote:

>
> In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.980909124102.224A-100000@chaos.analogic.com> you wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Daniel Engstrom wrote:
>
> >> On 8 Sep, David Lang wrote:
> >>
> >> > it arbitrates the but by listening to the bus as it transmits, if it hears
> >> > something different then it is transmitting it stops transmitting and the
> >> > other station continues (the first thing it transmits is it's own id # and
> >> > the node with more 1 bits in it's address will win as it will transmit a 1
> >> > while the other node transmits a 0, the 1 will make it on the bus and the
> >> > other node will stop)
> >>
> >> That would be a CAN bus arbitration....
> >> Or maybe I2C uses the same method...
>
> > The IIC bus has no arbitration capability at all. One checks a busy
>
> Did anyone mention IIC?
>

Yes. That's what I2C is. Usually called I-squared-C.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
Penguin : Linux version 2.1.118 on an i586 machine (66.15 BogoMips).
Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html