But do we really want the proprietary folks mooching off our hard work and
returning nothing? We do not want them to kill free software, but by the
same token we don't want them to be leeches; free software isn't so much a
socialism as an economic system where labor and services are the medium of
exchange, and so far the UDI folks propose not to "pay" for what they take.
| BK> Do you worry about the black helicopters as well?
|
| Hm. I'm could not understood your sentence. I'm seen "Black Shark" few times
| but since I'm could do nothing about it I'm not bother...
+--->8
I didn't check your domain until after I wrote that, sorry. It's something
of a US-specific joke/comment; from your domain I'd guess that you've seen
worse and there was no joking about it. :-/
| You misunderstood me. UDI is not related to M$ as of yet (I hope at least).
| But UDI existence could GREATLY simplyify Linux destroing task for M$. And
+--->8
Not really, since if it did it would simultaneously make commercial Unix
stronger --- unless it involved killing both at once, which is irrelevant to
UDI because nobody's going to drop their proprietary driver interfaces while
adding UDI. (That would be suicidal, because older third party drivers
would likely not be made available in a UDI version.)
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/