Re: Interesting scheduling times

Albert D. Cahalan (acahalan@cs.uml.edu)
Sun, 20 Sep 1998 04:14:01 -0400 (EDT)


David Holland writes:

>>> Any program that counts on the behavior of signal() in this
>>> manner is broken. What part of that isn't clear?
>>
>> Nothing. It is clearly wrong.
>
> This is at variance with accepted practice.

In 1998, it may be a substandard way to write code. That isn't
enough reason to justify breaking something that has worked
fine for 3 decades on UNIX systems and for many years on Linux.

There is no reason to convert Linux into a BSD clone at the
expense of existing Linux and UNIX source code. If you really
want BSD, you know where to get it.

>> [crap deleted]

Hmmm? You deleted the on-topic parts twice.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/