Re: [PATCH] scheduler patch, faster still

Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au)
Tue, 29 Sep 1998 14:35:29 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: smbmount and smbfs (was Re: smbmount et al...)"
Previous message: Nomad the Wanderer: "2.1.123 hangs at "Setting Clock""

Dennis Grant writes:
> Mr Goochs does indeed appear to be guilty of not providing benchmarks
> to back up his claims. He has provided a reasonable thought experiment,
> let him prove it. By the same token, those who wish to bandy about
> phrases like "obviously" would be better served by instead providing
> benchmarks **disproving** the postulation.

Aside: just call me "Richard". This "Mr. Gooch" thing is a bit too
formal for me :-)

Anyway, I don't know why some people think I'm not providing
numbers. Go look at: http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/benchmarks/ for
the results.

Regards,

Richard....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: smbmount and smbfs (was Re: smbmount et al...)"
Previous message: Nomad the Wanderer: "2.1.123 hangs at "Setting Clock""