Re: jitterbug

Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Thu, 1 Oct 1998 10:07:45 +0200 (MEST)


Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 1998, Keith Owens wrote:
>
> >With respect, what is also missing is a statement that we should (or
> >should not) be using jitterbug. It is a fairly well kept secret, no
> >mention at all anywhere in the source or the FAQ. A search of the
>
> Agreed. I was not aware of such patch queue before now ;-).
>
> >Note: jitterbug or something like it is a good idea. It just needs to
> > be more visible and official.
>
> I never used it and I don' t like it. This because my poor ppp connection
> is slow everywhere. The only TCP reliable service here is smtp (because
> it' s off-line of course ;-).
>
> I will feel confortable with jitterbug if somebody would act as a
> mail->jitterbug filter for me ;-).

It's called Jitterbug. You just can't look at the patches.

Have a look at wwwofl. (I haven't).

Roger.


>
> Right now I am _very_ confortable with sending my few patches to Linus
> because it' s via email.
>
> I also suggest everybody has a patch to post it on linux-kernel or to
> public an URL so I can use it even if it won' t fit in the next
> official kernel.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andrea[s] Arcangeli
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-- 
| Most people would die sooner than think....  |    R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl 
| in fact, most do.  -- Bertrand Russsell      |     phone: +31-15-2137555 
We write Linux device drivers for any device you may have! fax: ..-2138217

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/