Re: (dumb?) idea for kernel oops...

Shaun Wilson (plexus@ionet.net)
Tue, 6 Oct 1998 09:49:29 -0500 (CDT)


On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, James Willard wrote:

> Why don't we just make the kernel stable instead? :) Instead of saying
> "Oh, it will just recover itself in case of a hang" we should be thinking
> "It will not hang"
>

"I twill not hang. But if it shoudl for any strange reason, *this* might
be nice."

Is that a better thought?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/