Re: 2.0.36pre patches

Alistair Riddell (alistair@watsons.edin.sch.uk)
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 11:09:51 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ken Pizzini: "Re: [MOD] Returning the ip of a fragmented packet sender"
Previous message: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: 'disposable' dirty pages [was: Out Of Memory in v. 2.1]"

Just the last one. The patches apply to a clean 2.0.35 tree.

If this isn't in the FAQ list it should be...

On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Catalin BOIE wrote:

> I have to apply all patches (2.0.36-pre-patch-*) to 2.0.35 source tree or
> only the last one (13)?

-- Alistair Riddell - BOFH IT Support Department, George Watson's College, Edinburgh Tel: +44 131 447 7931 Ext 176 Fax: +44 131 452 8594 Microsoft - because god hates us

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ken Pizzini: "Re: [MOD] Returning the ip of a fragmented packet sender"
Previous message: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: 'disposable' dirty pages [was: Out Of Memory in v. 2.1]"