Re: [PATCH] NIPQUAD macro broken on big endian

Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 13:25:47 +0100 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [RFC] Potential bug in kernel_thread() on i386."
Previous message: Michael Meissner: "Re: [OT] Re: gdb vs. glibc (glibc-devel-2.0.7-19, aka RedHat 5.1) vs , linux 2.1.124"
In reply to: Martin Mares: "Re: [patch, 2.1.124] Re: BogoMIPS"

On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, David S. Miller wrote:

> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 13:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be>
>
> Do I read this correct?!? Is it more acceptable to have a bug[*],
> than a not optimal fix?!?!?
>
> s/optimal/stupid/

s/not stupid/stupid/

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [RFC] Potential bug in kernel_thread() on i386."
Previous message: Michael Meissner: "Re: [OT] Re: gdb vs. glibc (glibc-devel-2.0.7-19, aka RedHat 5.1) vs , linux 2.1.124"
In reply to: Martin Mares: "Re: [patch, 2.1.124] Re: BogoMIPS"